Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
LQD vs TIP: how they differ
LQD and TIP are both bond index funds, and over the year TIP returned more, −1.0% against −2.7%.
iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF and iShares TIPS Bond ETF.
| LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | TIP iShares TIPS Bond ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | US investment grade bonds | TIPS Bond |
| Total return, 1 year | −2.7% | −1.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −20.2 pts | −18.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.14% | 0.18% |
| Holdings | not filed | 48 |
LQD in plain words
LQD is a bond fund tracking the US investment grade bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year. It sat 6.4% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.
TIP in plain words
TIP is a bond fund tracking the TIPS Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −1.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, LQD or TIP?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, LQD returned −2.7% and TIP returned −1.0%, so TIP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, LQD or TIP?
- LQD charges 0.14% a year and TIP charges 0.18%, so LQD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, LQD against TIP, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/LQD-TIP Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources