Which returned more over the last year, LQD or SHV?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, LQD returned −2.7% and SHV returned +3.6%, so SHV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, LQD or SHV?

LQD charges 0.14% a year and SHV charges 0.15%, so LQD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

LQD vs SHV: how they differ

LQD and SHV are both bond index funds, and over the year SHV returned more, +3.6% against −2.7%.

iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF and iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF.

LQD and SHV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	iShares
What it is	US investment grade bonds	0-1 Year Treasury Bond
Total return, 1 year	−2.7%	+3.6%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−20.2 pts	−13.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.14%	0.15%
Holdings	not filed	13

LQD in plain words

LQD is a bond fund tracking the US investment grade bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year. It sat 6.4% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

SHV in plain words

SHV is a bond fund tracking the 0-1 Year Treasury Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, LQD or SHV?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, LQD returned −2.7% and SHV returned +3.6%, so SHV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, LQD or SHV?: LQD charges 0.14% a year and SHV charges 0.15%, so LQD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

LQD against SHV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, LQD against SHV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/LQD-SHV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources