Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
KWEB vs VTI
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, KWEB and VTI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in KWEB | Only in VTI |
|---|---|
| Tencent Holdings Limited 10.47% | NVIDIA Corp 6.37% |
| PDD Holdings Inc. 7.94% | Apple Inc 5.88% |
| Alibaba Group Holding Limited 7.72% | Microsoft Corp 3.84% |
| NETEASE, INC. 6.99% | Amazon.com Inc 3.19% |
| MEITUAN 6.84% | Alphabet Inc 2.90% |
| BAIDU, INC. 4.20% | Broadcom Inc 2.48% |
| Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd 4.17% | Alphabet Inc 2.29% |
| KUAISHOU TECHNOLOGY 4.09% | Micron Technology Inc 1.80% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026.
| KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Themes desk | Core fund |
| Issuer | KraneShares | Vanguard |
| What it is | Internet and e-commerce | US total market |
| Total return, 1 year | −27.2% | +20.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +20.0% | +20.0% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −47.2 pts | +0.0 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.69% | 0.03% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 88.3% |
| Holdings | 33 | 3531 |
KWEB in plain words
By weight, 0% of KWEB's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 60% of the fund across 33 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned −27.2% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 47.2 pts. It sits 69.8% below its all-time high of Feb 17, 2021.
VTI in plain words
VTI is a index equity fund tracking US total market. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +20.0% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3531 positions, with the top ten at 32.1%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, KWEB or VTI?
- In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, KWEB returned −27.2% and VTI returned +20.0%, so VTI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, KWEB or VTI?
- KWEB charges 0.69% a year and VTI charges 0.03%, so VTI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do KWEB and VTI overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of KWEB and 88% of VTI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
- Are KWEB and VTI the same kind of fund?
- No. KWEB is a thematic ETF and VTI is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, KWEB against VTI, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/KWEB-VTI.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources