Which is cheaper, KJUL or VTWO?

KJUL charges 0.79% a year and VTWO charges 0.07%, so VTWO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Are KJUL and VTWO the same kind of fund?

No. KJUL is a buffer ETF and VTWO is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

KJUL vs VTWO: how they differ

KJUL and VTWO are measured over different days, and VTWO charges 0.07% against 0.79%.

Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - Jul and Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund.

KJUL and VTWO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	KJUL Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - Jul	VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund
Where it sits	Buffer ETF	Core index fund
Issuer	Innovator	Vanguard
What it is	Defined outcome, 15% on IWM	Russell 2000
Total return, 1 year	not published	+21.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	not published	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	not available	+3.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.79%	0.07%
Holdings	not filed	1951

KJUL in plain words

From its price on Sep 12, 2026, the fund can gain about 20.6% more before it reaches its cap. Protection left, in index points: 11.2% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's IWM level. 292 days remained on Sep 12, 2026. On Jun 30, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

VTWO in plain words

VTWO is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 2000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1951 positions, with the top ten at 7.8%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, KJUL or VTWO?: KJUL charges 0.79% a year and VTWO charges 0.07%, so VTWO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Are KJUL and VTWO the same kind of fund?: No. KJUL is a buffer ETF and VTWO is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

KJUL against VTWO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, KJUL against VTWO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/KJUL-VTWO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources