Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IYR vs XLRE: how they differ

IYR and XLRE hold 80% of their weight in the same names, and XLRE returned more over the year.

iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF and State Street(R) Real Estate Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IYR and XLRE hold 80% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IYR and XLRE both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIYRXLRE
WELLTOWER INC.10.88%11.07%
PROLOGIS, INC.8.77%8.72%
SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC.4.79%5.01%
EQUINIX, INC.4.58%7.10%
DIGITAL REALTY TRUST, INC.4.41%4.55%
REALTY INCOME CORPORATION4.29%4.57%
AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION3.88%5.26%
PUBLIC STORAGE.3.74%4.51%
VENTAS, INC.3.21%4.50%
CBRE GROUP, INC.2.93%4.11%
IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED2.79%3.91%
CROWN CASTLE INC.2.46%3.44%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IYROnly in XLRE
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. 1.22%
W.P. CAREY INC. 1.18%
JONES LANG LASALLE INCORPORATED 1.07%
OMEGA HEALTHCARE INVESTORS, INC. 1.05%
SUN COMMUNITIES, INC. 1.03%
LAMAR ADVERTISING COMPANY 1.01%
Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. 0.94%
AGNC INVESTMENT CORP. 0.93%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

IYR and XLRE on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IYR
iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF
XLRE
State Street(R) Real Estate Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isU.S. Real EstateReal estate
Total return, 1 year+4.7%+5.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−12.8 pts−11.9 pts
Expense ratio0.37%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50080.4%100.0%
Holdings6131

IYR in plain words

IYR is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Real Estate. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 80% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 61 positions, with the top ten at 51.5%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Jul 28, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLRE in plain words

XLRE is an index equity fund tracking the Real estate. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +5.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 31 positions, with the top ten at 59.4%. It sat 5.6% below its high of Jul 28, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IYR or XLRE?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IYR returned +4.7% and XLRE returned +5.6%, so XLRE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IYR or XLRE?
IYR charges 0.37% a year and XLRE charges 0.08%, so XLRE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IYR and XLRE overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 80% of IYR and 100% of XLRE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 80% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IYR against XLRE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IYR against XLRE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IYR-XLRE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources