Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IYR vs VTV: how they differ

IYR and VTV hold 3% of their weight in the same names, and VTV returned more over the year.

iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF and Vanguard Value Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IYR and VTV hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IYR and VTV both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIYRVTV
PROLOGIS, INC.8.77%0.47%
AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION3.88%0.29%
SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC.4.79%0.26%
DIGITAL REALTY TRUST, INC.4.41%0.24%
PUBLIC STORAGE.3.74%0.19%
VENTAS, INC.3.21%0.16%
CBRE GROUP, INC.2.93%0.15%
IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED2.79%0.13%
CROWN CASTLE INC.2.46%0.12%
EXTRA SPACE STORAGE INC.2.28%0.12%
REALTY INCOME CORPORATION4.29%0.11%
VICI PROPERTIES INC.2.16%0.10%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IYROnly in VTV
WELLTOWER INC. 10.88%Micron Technology Inc 4.89%
EQUINIX, INC. 4.58%JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.07%
ESSEX PROPERTY TRUST, INC. 1.39%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.96%
SBA COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION 1.39%Johnson & Johnson 2.30%
WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY 1.28%Exxon Mobil Corp 2.13%
KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION. 1.27%Walmart Inc 1.87%
INVITATION HOMES INC. 1.23%Caterpillar Inc 1.84%
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. 1.22%AbbVie Inc 1.67%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

IYR and VTV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IYR
iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF
VTV
Vanguard Value Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isU.S. Real EstateUS value
Total return, 1 year+4.7%+22.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−12.8 pts+5.4 pts
Expense ratio0.37%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50080.4%98.6%
Holdings61308

IYR in plain words

IYR is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Real Estate. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 80% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 61 positions, with the top ten at 51.5%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Jul 28, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VTV in plain words

VTV is an index equity fund tracking the US value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 308 positions, with the top ten at 23.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IYR or VTV?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IYR returned +4.7% and VTV returned +22.9%, so VTV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IYR or VTV?
IYR charges 0.37% a year and VTV charges 0.03%, so VTV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IYR and VTV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 80% of IYR and 99% of VTV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 3% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IYR against VTV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IYR against VTV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IYR-VTV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources