Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IYR vs SCHX: how they differ

IYR and SCHX hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and SCHX returned more over the year.

iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IYR and SCHX hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IYR and SCHX both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIYRSCHX
WELLTOWER INC.10.88%0.21%
PROLOGIS, INC.8.77%0.20%
EQUINIX, INC.4.58%0.15%
AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION3.88%0.13%
SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC.4.79%0.10%
DIGITAL REALTY TRUST, INC.4.41%0.09%
REALTY INCOME CORPORATION4.29%0.08%
PUBLIC STORAGE.3.74%0.07%
CROWN CASTLE INC.2.46%0.06%
VENTAS, INC.3.21%0.06%
IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED2.79%0.06%
CBRE GROUP, INC.2.93%0.05%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IYROnly in SCHX
BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUP INC. 0.72%NVIDIA Corp 7.51%
AGREE REALTY CORPORATION 0.68%Apple Inc 6.71%
FIRST INDUSTRIAL REALTY TRUST, INC. 0.60%Microsoft Corp 4.89%
STAG INDUSTRIAL, INC. 0.54%Amazon.com Inc 3.87%
HEALTHCARE REALTY TRUST INCORPORATED 0.52%Alphabet Inc 3.24%
VORNADO REALTY TRUST 0.46%Broadcom Inc 3.10%
RITHM CAPITAL CORP. 0.39%Alphabet Inc 2.58%
COUSINS PROPERTIES INCORPORATED 0.37%Meta Platforms Inc 2.02%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

IYR and SCHX on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IYR
iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesSchwab
What it isU.S. Real EstateU.S. Large-Cap
Total return, 1 year+4.7%+16.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−12.8 pts−0.7 pts
Expense ratio0.37%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50080.4%94.9%
Holdings61748

IYR in plain words

IYR is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Real Estate. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 80% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 61 positions, with the top ten at 51.5%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Jul 28, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SCHX in plain words

SCHX is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 748 positions, with the top ten at 37.3%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IYR or SCHX?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IYR returned +4.7% and SCHX returned +16.8%, so SCHX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IYR or SCHX?
IYR charges 0.37% a year and SCHX charges 0.03%, so SCHX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IYR and SCHX overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 80% of IYR and 95% of SCHX by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IYR against SCHX, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IYR against SCHX, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IYR-SCHX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources