Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IYR vs QUAL: how they differ

IYR and QUAL hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and QUAL returned more over the year.

iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF and iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IYR and QUAL hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IYR and QUAL both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIYRQUAL
PROLOGIS, INC.8.77%0.57%
SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC.4.79%0.36%
PUBLIC STORAGE.3.74%0.25%
CBRE GROUP, INC.2.93%0.19%
VICI PROPERTIES INC.2.16%0.14%
AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC.1.95%0.12%
EQUITY RESIDENTIAL1.72%0.11%
COSTAR GROUP, INC.0.86%0.07%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IYROnly in QUAL
WELLTOWER INC. 10.88%NVIDIA CORPORATION 6.52%
EQUINIX, INC. 4.58%APPLE INC. 6.28%
DIGITAL REALTY TRUST, INC. 4.41%MICROSOFT CORPORATION 5.05%
REALTY INCOME CORPORATION 4.29%META PLATFORMS, INC. 3.50%
AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION 3.88%LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION 3.23%
VENTAS, INC. 3.21%THE TJX COMPANIES, INC. 3.19%
IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED 2.79%VISA INC. 3.09%
CROWN CASTLE INC. 2.46%ELI LILLY AND COMPANY 2.92%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

IYR and QUAL on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IYR
iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isU.S. Real EstateMSCI USA Quality Factor
Total return, 1 year+4.7%+16.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−12.8 pts−1.5 pts
Expense ratio0.37%0.15%
Already in the S&P 50080.4%98.9%
Holdings61121

IYR in plain words

IYR is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Real Estate. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 80% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 61 positions, with the top ten at 51.5%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Jul 28, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

QUAL in plain words

QUAL is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 121 positions, with the top ten at 39.1%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IYR or QUAL?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IYR returned +4.7% and QUAL returned +16.0%, so QUAL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IYR or QUAL?
IYR charges 0.37% a year and QUAL charges 0.15%, so QUAL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IYR and QUAL overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 80% of IYR and 99% of QUAL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IYR against QUAL, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IYR against QUAL, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IYR-QUAL Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources