Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IYR vs MDY: how they differ
IYR and MDY hold 6% of their weight in the same names, and MDY returned more over the year.
iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF and SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF Trust.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IYR and MDY hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IYR | MDY |
|---|---|---|
| ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. | 1.22% | 0.45% |
| W.P. CAREY INC. | 1.18% | 0.44% |
| JONES LANG LASALLE INCORPORATED | 1.07% | 0.40% |
| OMEGA HEALTHCARE INVESTORS, INC. | 1.05% | 0.39% |
| LAMAR ADVERTISING COMPANY | 1.01% | 0.38% |
| Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. | 0.94% | 0.35% |
| EQUITY LIFESTYLE PROPERTIES, INC. | 0.93% | 0.34% |
| EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. | 0.81% | 0.30% |
| AMERICAN HOMES 4 RENT | 0.79% | 0.29% |
| BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUP INC. | 0.72% | 0.27% |
| AGREE REALTY CORPORATION | 0.68% | 0.25% |
| CUBESMART | 0.67% | 0.25% |
| Only in IYR | Only in MDY |
|---|---|
| WELLTOWER INC. 10.88% | TWILIO INC 0.86% |
| PROLOGIS, INC. 8.77% | CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP 0.85% |
| SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC. 4.79% | MKS INC 0.83% |
| EQUINIX, INC. 4.58% | CURTISS-WRIGHT CORP 0.77% |
| DIGITAL REALTY TRUST, INC. 4.41% | ENTEGRIS INC 0.76% |
| REALTY INCOME CORPORATION 4.29% | NVENT ELECTRIC PLC 0.76% |
| AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION 3.88% | ATI INC 0.74% |
| PUBLIC STORAGE. 3.74% | ILLUMINA INC 0.73% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
| IYR iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF | MDY SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF Trust | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | State Street |
| What it is | U.S. Real Estate | S&P MidCap 400, book from IJH |
| Total return, 1 year | +4.7% | +13.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −12.8 pts | −4.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.37% | 0.23% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 80.4% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 61 | 400 |
IYR in plain words
IYR is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Real Estate. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 80% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 61 positions, with the top ten at 51.5%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Jul 28, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
MDY in plain words
MDY is an index equity fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.23% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 400 positions, with the top ten at 7.7%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IYR or MDY?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IYR returned +4.7% and MDY returned +13.0%, so MDY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IYR or MDY?
- IYR charges 0.37% a year and MDY charges 0.23%, so MDY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IYR and MDY overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 80% of IYR and 0% of MDY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 6% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IYR against MDY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IYR-MDY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources