Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IYE vs VO: how they differ

IYE and VO hold 7% of their weight in the same names, and IYE returned more over the year.

iShares U.S. Energy ETF and Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IYE and VO hold 7% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IYE and VO both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIYEVO
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION3.54%0.75%
MARATHON PETROLEUM CORPORATION3.44%0.72%
SLB N.V.3.95%0.67%
PHILLIPS 663.32%0.66%
TARGA RESOURCES CORP.2.46%0.56%
BAKER HUGHES COMPANY3.13%0.53%
ONEOK, INC.2.59%0.53%
CHENIERE ENERGY, INC.2.62%0.49%
DEVON ENERGY CORPORATION1.39%0.46%
THE WILLIAMS COMPANIES, INC.4.38%0.44%
OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION1.91%0.35%
DIAMONDBACK ENERGY, INC.1.80%0.34%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IYEOnly in VO
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 21.74%Vertiv Holdings Co 1.23%
CHEVRON CORPORATION 15.41%Western Digital Corp 1.07%
CONOCOPHILLIPS 6.51%Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 1.05%
EOG RESOURCES, INC. 3.56%Quanta Services Inc 1.05%
TECHNIPFMC PLC 1.35%Howmet Aerospace Inc 1.04%
COTERRA ENERGY INC. 1.21%Cummins Inc 0.95%
EXPAND ENERGY CORPORATION 1.04%Datadog Inc 0.84%
OVINTIV INC. 0.79%Bloom Energy Corp 0.79%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

IYE and VO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IYE
iShares U.S. Energy ETF
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isU.S. EnergyMid-Cap
Total return, 1 year+48.8%+12.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+31.3 pts−5.5 pts
Expense ratio0.37%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50089.0%91.4%
Holdings38282

IYE in plain words

IYE is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Energy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +48.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 89% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 38 positions, with the top ten at 69.0%.

VO in plain words

VO is an index equity fund tracking the Mid-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 9.6%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IYE or VO?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IYE returned +48.8% and VO returned +12.0%, so IYE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IYE or VO?
IYE charges 0.37% a year and VO charges 0.03%, so VO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IYE and VO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 89% of IYE and 91% of VO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 7% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IYE against VO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IYE against VO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IYE-VO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources