Which returned more over the last year, IWM or VTV?

In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWM returned +26.4% and VTV returned +26.2%, so IWM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, IWM or VTV?

IWM charges 0.19% a year and VTV charges 0.03%, so VTV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

How much do IWM and VTV overlap with the S&P 500?

By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IWM and 99% of VTV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

IWM vs VTV

Name: ETFIQ comparison of IWM and VTV
Creator: ETFIQ
License: https://etfiq.com/standards/

iShares Russell 2000 ETF and Vanguard Value Index Fund.

IWM and VTV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF	VTV Vanguard Value Index Fund
Where it sits	Core fund	Core fund
Issuer	iShares	Vanguard
What it is	Russell 2000	US value
Total return, 1 year	+26.4%	+26.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+20.0%	+20.0%
Gap to the S&P 500	+6.5 pts	+6.3 pts
Expense ratio	0.19%	0.03%
Already in the S&P 500	0.0%	98.6%
Holdings	2014	308

IWM in plain words

IWM is a index equity fund tracking Russell 2000. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +26.4% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2014 positions, with the top ten at 3.4%.

VTV in plain words

VTV is a index equity fund tracking US value. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +26.2% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 308 positions, with the top ten at 23.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWM or VTV?: In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWM returned +26.4% and VTV returned +26.2%, so IWM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IWM or VTV?: IWM charges 0.19% a year and VTV charges 0.03%, so VTV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWM and VTV overlap with the S&P 500?: By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IWM and 99% of VTV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWM against VTV, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWM-VTV.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. ETFIQ publishes the same fields for every fund and suggests no allocation. Standards and sources