Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IWM vs VTV
iShares Russell 2000 ETF and Vanguard Value Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IWM and VTV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in IWM | Only in VTV |
|---|---|
| Moog, Inc. 0.38% | Micron Technology Inc 4.89% |
| Hut 8 Corp. 0.37% | JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.07% |
| Viasat, Inc. 0.35% | Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.96% |
| BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. 0.35% | Johnson & Johnson 2.30% |
| Cytokinetics, Inc. 0.35% | Exxon Mobil Corp 2.13% |
| MaxLinear, Inc. 0.34% | Walmart Inc 1.87% |
| Argan, Inc. 0.34% | Caterpillar Inc 1.84% |
| UMB Financial Corp. 0.33% | AbbVie Inc 1.67% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026.
| IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | VTV Vanguard Value Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core fund | Core fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Vanguard |
| What it is | Russell 2000 | US value |
| Total return, 1 year | +26.4% | +26.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +20.0% | +20.0% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +6.5 pts | +6.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.19% | 0.03% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 98.6% |
| Holdings | 2014 | 308 |
IWM in plain words
IWM is a index equity fund tracking Russell 2000. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +26.4% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2014 positions, with the top ten at 3.4%.
VTV in plain words
VTV is a index equity fund tracking US value. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +26.2% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 308 positions, with the top ten at 23.7%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWM or VTV?
- In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWM returned +26.4% and VTV returned +26.2%, so IWM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IWM or VTV?
- IWM charges 0.19% a year and VTV charges 0.03%, so VTV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IWM and VTV overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IWM and 99% of VTV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWM against VTV, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWM-VTV.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources