Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IWM vs VGT

iShares Russell 2000 ETF and Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWM and VGT hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IWM and VGT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIWMVGT
Hut 8 Corp.0.37%0.13%
Riot Platforms, Inc.0.30%0.12%
MaxLinear, Inc.0.34%0.11%
Viasat, Inc.0.35%0.10%
Core Scientific, Inc.0.25%0.10%
D-Wave Quantum, Inc.0.28%0.10%
Cipher Digital, Inc.0.26%0.09%
Plexus Corp.0.25%0.09%
Vishay Intertechnology, Inc.0.21%0.09%
Novanta, Inc.0.18%0.08%
Silicon Laboratories, Inc.0.23%0.08%
Rigetti Computing, Inc.0.20%0.08%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IWMOnly in VGT
Moog, Inc. 0.38%NVIDIA Corp 16.85%
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. 0.35%Apple Inc 14.59%
Cytokinetics, Inc. 0.35%Microsoft Corp 9.47%
Argan, Inc. 0.34%Broadcom Inc 4.21%
UMB Financial Corp. 0.33%Micron Technology Inc 4.21%
JFrog Ltd. 0.31%Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.21%
Krystal Biotech, Inc. 0.30%Intel Corp 2.03%
ESCO Technologies, Inc. 0.29%Cisco Systems Inc 1.85%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

IWM and VGT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund
Where it sitsCore fundCore fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isRussell 2000Information technology
Total return, 1 year+26.4%+39.7%
S&P 500 over the same days+20.0%+20.0%
Gap to the S&P 500+6.5 pts+19.7 pts
Expense ratio0.19%0.09%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%86.9%
Holdings2014317

IWM in plain words

IWM is a index equity fund tracking Russell 2000. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +26.4% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2014 positions, with the top ten at 3.4%.

VGT in plain words

VGT is a index equity fund tracking Information technology. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +39.7% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 317 positions, with the top ten at 59.5%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 4, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWM or VGT?
In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWM returned +26.4% and VGT returned +39.7%, so VGT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IWM or VGT?
IWM charges 0.19% a year and VGT charges 0.09%, so VGT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWM and VGT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IWM and 87% of VGT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IWM against VGT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 4, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWM against VGT, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWM-VGT.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources