Which returned more over the last year, IWM or VCLT?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWM returned +21.2% and VCLT returned −4.8%, so IWM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, IWM or VCLT?

IWM charges 0.19% a year and VCLT charges 0.03%, so VCLT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IWM vs VCLT: how they differ

IWM and VCLT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IWM returned more over the year.

iShares Russell 2000 ETF and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWM and VCLT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IWM	Only in VCLT
Moog, Inc. 0.38%	Anheuser-Busch Cos LLC / Anheuser-Busch 0.38%
Hut 8 Corp. 0.37%	CVS Health Corp 0.34%
Viasat, Inc. 0.35%	Meta Platforms Inc 0.29%
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. 0.35%	Boeing Co/The 0.27%
Cytokinetics, Inc. 0.35%	Pfizer Investment Enterprises Pte Ltd 0.27%
MaxLinear, Inc. 0.34%	Amazon.com Inc 0.26%
Argan, Inc. 0.34%	Oracle Corp 0.24%
UMB Financial Corp. 0.33%	AT&T Inc 0.24%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

IWM and VCLT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF	VCLT Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Vanguard
What it is	Russell 2000	Long-Term Corporate Bond
Total return, 1 year	+21.2%	−4.8%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+3.7 pts	−22.3 pts
Expense ratio	0.19%	0.03%
Holdings	2014	2775

IWM in plain words

IWM is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 2000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2014 positions, with the top ten at 3.4%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VCLT in plain words

VCLT is a bond fund tracking the Long-Term Corporate Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −4.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 18.1% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWM or VCLT?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWM returned +21.2% and VCLT returned −4.8%, so IWM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IWM or VCLT?: IWM charges 0.19% a year and VCLT charges 0.03%, so VCLT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IWM against VCLT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWM against VCLT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWM-VCLT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources