Which is cheaper, IWM or SCJL?

IWM charges 0.19% a year and SCJL charges 0.30%, so IWM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Are IWM and SCJL the same kind of fund?

No. IWM is an index ETF and SCJL is a buffer ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IWM vs SCJL: how they differ

IWM and SCJL are measured over different days, and IWM charges 0.19% against 0.30%.

iShares Russell 2000 ETF and Corgi U.S. Small-Cap 15% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series.

IWM and SCJL on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF	SCJL Corgi U.S. Small-Cap 15% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series
Where it sits	Core index fund	Buffer ETF
Issuer	iShares	Corgi
What it is	Russell 2000	Defined outcome, 15% on IWM
Total return, 1 year	+21.2%	not published
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	not published
Gap to the S&P 500	+3.7 pts	not available
Expense ratio	0.19%	0.30%
Holdings	2014	not filed

IWM in plain words

IWM is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 2000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2014 positions, with the top ten at 3.4%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SCJL in plain words

Protection left, in index points: 11.5% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's IWM level. 292 days remained on Sep 12, 2026. On Jun 30, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, IWM or SCJL?: IWM charges 0.19% a year and SCJL charges 0.30%, so IWM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Are IWM and SCJL the same kind of fund?: No. IWM is an index ETF and SCJL is a buffer ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IWM against SCJL, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWM against SCJL, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWM-SCJL Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources