Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IWM vs SCHD

iShares Russell 2000 ETF and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWM and SCHD hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IWM and SCHD both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIWMSCHD
Murphy Oil Corp.0.14%0.12%
Moelis & Co.0.12%0.13%
Korn Ferry0.11%0.09%
Artisan Partners Asset Management, Inc.0.07%0.07%
CVB Financial Corp.0.11%0.07%
Marzetti Co. (The)0.07%0.06%
Banner Corp.0.07%0.06%
OFG Bancorp0.06%0.05%
Cohen & Steers, Inc.0.07%0.05%
National Bank Holdings Corp.0.06%0.05%
City Holding Co.0.06%0.04%
Interparfums, Inc.0.06%0.04%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IWMOnly in SCHD
Moog, Inc. 0.38%QUALCOMM Inc 6.75%
Hut 8 Corp. 0.37%Texas Instruments Inc 5.92%
Viasat, Inc. 0.35%UnitedHealth Group Inc 5.10%
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. 0.35%Coca-Cola Co/The 3.96%
Cytokinetics, Inc. 0.35%Merck & Co Inc 3.87%
MaxLinear, Inc. 0.34%Chevron Corp 3.84%
Argan, Inc. 0.34%Verizon Communications Inc 3.66%
UMB Financial Corp. 0.33%Procter & Gamble Co/The 3.55%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

IWM and SCHD on the fields both publish, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
Where it sitsCore fundCore fund
IssueriSharesSchwab
What it isRussell 2000US dividend
Total return, 1 year+26.4%+30.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+20.0%+20.0%
Gap to the S&P 500+6.5 pts+10.3 pts
Expense ratio0.19%0.06%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%95.1%
Holdings201499

IWM in plain words

IWM is a index equity fund tracking Russell 2000. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +26.4% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2014 positions, with the top ten at 3.4%.

SCHD in plain words

SCHD is a index equity fund tracking US dividend. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +30.3% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 43.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWM or SCHD?
In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWM returned +26.4% and SCHD returned +30.3%, so SCHD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IWM or SCHD?
IWM charges 0.19% a year and SCHD charges 0.06%, so SCHD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWM and SCHD overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IWM and 95% of SCHD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IWM against SCHD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 4, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWM against SCHD, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWM-SCHD.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources