Which returned more over the last year, IWM or SCHB?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWM returned +21.2% and SCHB returned +17.2%, so IWM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IWM vs SCHB: how they differ

IWM and SCHB are both equity index funds, and over the year IWM returned more, +21.2% against +17.2%.

iShares Russell 2000 ETF and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF.

IWM and SCHB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF	SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Schwab
What it is	Russell 2000	US broad market, book from ITOT
Total return, 1 year	+21.2%	+17.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+3.7 pts	−0.3 pts
Expense ratio	0.19%	not published
Holdings	2014	not filed

IWM in plain words

IWM is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 2000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2014 positions, with the top ten at 3.4%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SCHB in plain words

SCHB is an index equity fund tracking the US broad market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWM or SCHB?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWM returned +21.2% and SCHB returned +17.2%, so IWM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IWM against SCHB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWM against SCHB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWM-SCHB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources