Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IWF vs XOVR: how they differ
IWF and XOVR hold 23% of their weight in the same names, and IWF returned more over the year.
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF and ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IWF and XOVR hold 23% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IWF | XOVR |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORPORATION | 13.85% | 9.48% |
| ALPHABET INC. | 6.18% | 6.53% |
| META PLATFORMS, INC. | 3.01% | 4.47% |
| TESLA, INC. | 3.65% | 1.63% |
| PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC. | 0.77% | 0.56% |
| ARISTA NETWORKS, INC. | 0.53% | 2.31% |
| APPLOVIN CORPORATION | 0.37% | 3.95% |
| Astera Labs, Inc | 0.22% | 7.75% |
| DOORDASH, INC. | 0.20% | 2.04% |
| MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, INC. | 0.19% | 1.77% |
| ROBINHOOD MARKETS, INC. | 0.19% | 3.56% |
| ROCKET LAB CORPORATION | 0.16% | 2.50% |
| Only in IWF | Only in XOVR |
|---|---|
| APPLE INC. 6.72% | Veeva Systems Inc 3.17% |
| BROADCOM INC. 5.21% | Virtu Financial Inc 1.86% |
| ALPHABET INC. 4.98% | Resmed Inc 1.36% |
| MICROSOFT CORPORATION 4.11% | Globus Medical Inc 1.35% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 3.86% | N/A 0.05% |
| ELI LILLY AND COMPANY 2.84% | |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 2.80% | |
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 1.70% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
| IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | XOVR ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | ERShares |
| What it is | Russell 1000 growth | Private-Public Crossover |
| Total return, 1 year | +7.0% | 0.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −10.5 pts | −17.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.75% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 93.6% | 43.4% |
| Holdings | 368 | 32 |
IWF in plain words
IWF is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 368 positions, with the top ten at 54.4%. It sat 5.0% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
XOVR in plain words
XOVR is an index equity fund tracking the Private-Public Crossover. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned 0.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 43% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 32 positions, with the top ten at 63.1%. It sat 4.2% below its high of Oct 27, 2025 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWF or XOVR?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWF returned +7.0% and XOVR returned 0.0%, so IWF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IWF or XOVR?
- IWF charges 0.18% a year and XOVR charges 0.75%, so IWF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IWF and XOVR overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 94% of IWF and 43% of XOVR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 23% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWF against XOVR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWF-XOVR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources