Which returned more over the last year, IWF or VUSB?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWF returned +7.0% and VUSB returned +3.7%, so IWF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, IWF or VUSB?

IWF charges 0.18% a year and VUSB charges 0.10%, so VUSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IWF vs VUSB: how they differ

IWF and VUSB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IWF returned more over the year.

iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF and Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWF and VUSB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IWF	Only in VUSB
NVIDIA CORPORATION 13.85%	United States Treasury Bill 4.24%
APPLE INC. 6.72%	United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.68%
ALPHABET INC. 6.18%	PNC Financial Services Group Inc/The 0.59%
BROADCOM INC. 5.21%	United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.53%
ALPHABET INC. 4.98%	Regions Bank/Birmingham AL 0.52%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 4.11%	US Bancorp 0.51%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 3.86%	Charles Schwab Corp/The 0.50%
TESLA, INC. 3.65%	Truist Bank 0.45%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

IWF and VUSB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF	VUSB Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Vanguard
What it is	Russell 1000 growth	Ultra-Short Bond
Total return, 1 year	+7.0%	+3.7%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−10.5 pts	−13.8 pts
Expense ratio	0.18%	0.10%
Holdings	368	1281

IWF in plain words

IWF is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 368 positions, with the top ten at 54.4%. It sat 5.0% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VUSB in plain words

VUSB is a cash and treasury bills tracking the Ultra-Short Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWF or VUSB?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWF returned +7.0% and VUSB returned +3.7%, so IWF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IWF or VUSB?: IWF charges 0.18% a year and VUSB charges 0.10%, so VUSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IWF against VUSB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWF against VUSB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWF-VUSB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources