Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IWD vs XHB: how they differ
IWD and XHB hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and IWD returned more over the year.
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Homebuilders ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IWD and XHB hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IWD | XHB |
|---|---|---|
| LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC. | 0.35% | 3.03% |
| THE HOME DEPOT, INC. | 0.26% | 3.28% |
| CARRIER GLOBAL CORPORATION | 0.16% | 3.20% |
| D.R. HORTON, INC. | 0.12% | 3.29% |
| PULTEGROUP, INC. | 0.07% | 3.44% |
| WILLIAMS-SONOMA, INC. | 0.07% | 3.34% |
| LENNAR CORPORATION | 0.05% | 2.99% |
| MASCO CORPORATION | 0.05% | 3.41% |
| TOLL BROTHERS, INC. | 0.04% | 3.52% |
| Somnigroup International Inc. | 0.04% | 3.40% |
| CARLISLE COMPANIES INCORPORATED | 0.04% | 3.28% |
| LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. | 0.04% | 3.37% |
| Only in IWD | Only in XHB |
|---|---|
| AMAZON.COM, INC. 5.95% | KB Home 3.56% |
| APPLE INC. 5.38% | Meritage Homes Corp 3.53% |
| MICROSOFT CORPORATION 3.89% | Installed Building Products Inc 3.49% |
| BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 2.62% | Champion Homes Inc 3.34% |
| JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 2.46% | Trane Technologies PLC 3.25% |
| INTEL CORPORATION 1.72% | Cavco Industries Inc 3.23% |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.72% | Allegion plc 3.22% |
| EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 1.60% | Johnson Controls International plc 3.11% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
| IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | XHB State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Homebuilders ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | State Street |
| What it is | Russell 1000 value | SPDR S&P Homebuilders |
| Total return, 1 year | +27.4% | −16.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +9.9 pts | −34.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.35% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 90.2% | 45.7% |
| Holdings | 870 | 35 |
IWD in plain words
IWD is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +27.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 870 positions, with the top ten at 27.9%.
XHB in plain words
XHB is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Homebuilders. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −16.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 46% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 35 positions, with the top ten at 35.6%. It sat 20.6% below its high of Oct 18, 2024 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWD or XHB?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWD returned +27.4% and XHB returned −16.6%, so IWD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IWD or XHB?
- IWD charges 0.18% a year and XHB charges 0.35%, so IWD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IWD and XHB overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 90% of IWD and 46% of XHB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWD against XHB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWD-XHB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources