Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IWD vs VOOG: how they differ

IWD and VOOG hold 30% of their weight in the same names, and IWD returned more over the year.

iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWD and VOOG hold 30% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IWD and VOOG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIWDVOOG
APPLE INC.5.38%6.38%
AMAZON.COM, INC.5.95%3.90%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION3.89%9.31%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC.2.62%2.42%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.2.46%1.43%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON1.72%0.89%
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.1.30%0.70%
RTX CORPORATION0.72%0.67%
META PLATFORMS, INC.0.63%3.85%
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC.0.82%0.53%
ABBVIE INC.1.15%0.49%
Philip Morris International Inc.0.79%0.43%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IWDOnly in VOOG
INTEL CORPORATION 1.72%NVIDIA Corp 14.29%
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 1.60%Alphabet Inc 6.17%
WALMART INC. 1.28%Broadcom Inc 5.90%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED 1.05%Alphabet Inc 4.90%
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION 0.99%Micron Technology Inc 3.04%
THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY 0.96%Eli Lilly & Co 2.44%
MERCK & CO., INC. 0.89%Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.34%
CHEVRON CORPORATION 0.86%Tesla Inc 2.12%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

IWD and VOOG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWD
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isRussell 1000 valueS&P 500 Growth
Total return, 1 year+27.4%+17.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+9.9 pts+0.3 pts
Expense ratio0.18%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50090.2%100.0%
Holdings870146

IWD in plain words

IWD is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +27.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 870 positions, with the top ten at 27.9%.

VOOG in plain words

VOOG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 146 positions, with the top ten at 60.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWD or VOOG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWD returned +27.4% and VOOG returned +17.8%, so IWD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IWD or VOOG?
IWD charges 0.18% a year and VOOG charges 0.05%, so VOOG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWD and VOOG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 90% of IWD and 100% of VOOG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 30% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IWD against VOOG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWD against VOOG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWD-VOOG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources