Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IWD vs VONG: how they differ
IWD and VONG hold 25% of their weight in the same names, and IWD returned more over the year.
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IWD and VONG hold 25% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IWD | VONG |
|---|---|---|
| APPLE INC. | 5.38% | 11.97% |
| AMAZON.COM, INC. | 5.95% | 5.07% |
| MICROSOFT CORPORATION | 3.89% | 8.98% |
| ABBVIE INC. | 1.15% | 1.16% |
| COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION | 0.66% | 1.28% |
| META PLATFORMS, INC. | 0.63% | 3.20% |
| THE COCA-COLA COMPANY | 0.79% | 0.45% |
| UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. | 0.36% | 0.43% |
| VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED | 0.35% | 0.34% |
| THE HOME DEPOT, INC. | 0.26% | 0.73% |
| THE TJX COMPANIES, INC. | 0.26% | 0.26% |
| O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. | 0.21% | 0.20% |
| Only in IWD | Only in VONG |
|---|---|
| BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 2.62% | NVIDIA Corp 13.09% |
| JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 2.46% | Broadcom Inc 5.78% |
| INTEL CORPORATION 1.72% | Alphabet Inc 3.91% |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.72% | Tesla Inc 3.48% |
| EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 1.60% | Alphabet Inc 3.15% |
| CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 1.30% | Eli Lilly & Co 2.67% |
| UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED 1.05% | Visa Inc 1.57% |
| THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY 0.96% | Advanced Micro Devices Inc 1.47% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Vanguard |
| What it is | Russell 1000 value | Russell 1000 Growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +27.4% | +7.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +9.9 pts | −10.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.07% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 90.2% | 95.6% |
| Holdings | 870 | 387 |
IWD in plain words
IWD is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +27.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 870 positions, with the top ten at 27.9%.
VONG in plain words
VONG is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 387 positions, with the top ten at 61.3%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWD or VONG?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWD returned +27.4% and VONG returned +7.2%, so IWD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IWD or VONG?
- IWD charges 0.18% a year and VONG charges 0.07%, so VONG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IWD and VONG overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 90% of IWD and 96% of VONG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 25% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWD against VONG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWD-VONG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources