Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IWD vs VLUE: how they differ

IWD and VLUE hold 21% of their weight in the same names, and VLUE returned more over the year.

iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF and iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWD and VLUE hold 21% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IWD and VLUE both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIWDVLUE
INTEL CORPORATION1.72%9.29%
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.1.30%4.97%
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION0.99%1.88%
MERCK & CO., INC.0.89%1.57%
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY0.71%1.12%
CITIGROUP INC.0.57%1.94%
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED0.55%1.80%
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC.0.50%2.66%
THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY0.48%1.09%
AT&T INC.0.39%2.53%
PFIZER INC.0.39%1.49%
CVS HEALTH CORPORATION0.37%1.11%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IWDOnly in VLUE
AMAZON.COM, INC. 5.95%MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 11.63%
APPLE INC. 5.38%APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 3.67%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 3.89%WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION 1.89%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 2.62%NXP Semiconductors N.V. 1.00%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 2.46%TE CONNECTIVITY PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 0.93%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.72%SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC. 0.62%
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 1.60%JABIL INC. 0.57%
WALMART INC. 1.28%EXPEDIA GROUP, INC. 0.51%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

IWD and VLUE on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWD
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
VLUE
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isRussell 1000 valueMSCI USA Value Factor
Total return, 1 year+27.4%+69.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+9.9 pts+51.9 pts
Expense ratio0.18%0.15%
Already in the S&P 50090.2%96.9%
Holdings870148

IWD in plain words

IWD is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +27.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 870 positions, with the top ten at 27.9%.

VLUE in plain words

VLUE is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Value Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +69.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 148 positions, with the top ten at 43.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWD or VLUE?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWD returned +27.4% and VLUE returned +69.4%, so VLUE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IWD or VLUE?
IWD charges 0.18% a year and VLUE charges 0.15%, so VLUE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWD and VLUE overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 90% of IWD and 97% of VLUE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 21% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IWD against VLUE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWD against VLUE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWD-VLUE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources