Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IWD vs SPYG: how they differ

IWD and SPYG hold 29% of their weight in the same names, and IWD returned more over the year.

iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWD and SPYG hold 29% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IWD and SPYG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIWDSPYG
APPLE INC.5.38%5.99%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION3.89%7.81%
AMAZON.COM, INC.5.95%3.48%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC.2.62%2.58%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.2.46%1.68%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON1.72%1.02%
RTX CORPORATION0.72%0.72%
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.1.30%0.69%
META PLATFORMS, INC.0.63%3.49%
ABBVIE INC.1.15%0.58%
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC.0.82%0.55%
WELLTOWER INC.0.45%0.45%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IWDOnly in SPYG
INTEL CORPORATION 1.72%NVIDIA Corp 13.66%
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 1.60%Alphabet Inc 5.91%
WALMART INC. 1.28%Broadcom Inc 5.04%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED 1.05%Alphabet Inc 4.71%
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION 0.99%Micron Technology Inc 3.67%
THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY 0.96%Eli Lilly & Co 2.67%
MERCK & CO., INC. 0.89%Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.67%
CHEVRON CORPORATION 0.86%Tesla Inc 2.07%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

IWD and SPYG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWD
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
SPYG
State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isRussell 1000 valueSPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth
Total return, 1 year+27.4%+17.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+9.9 pts+0.4 pts
Expense ratio0.18%0.04%
Already in the S&P 50090.2%100.0%
Holdings870147

IWD in plain words

IWD is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +27.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 870 positions, with the top ten at 27.9%.

SPYG in plain words

SPYG is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 147 positions, with the top ten at 56.4%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWD or SPYG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWD returned +27.4% and SPYG returned +17.9%, so IWD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IWD or SPYG?
IWD charges 0.18% a year and SPYG charges 0.04%, so SPYG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWD and SPYG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 90% of IWD and 100% of SPYG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 29% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IWD against SPYG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWD against SPYG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWD-SPYG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources