Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IWD vs SCHG: how they differ
IWD and SCHG hold 28% of their weight in the same names, and IWD returned more over the year.
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IWD and SCHG hold 28% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IWD | SCHG |
|---|---|---|
| AMAZON.COM, INC. | 5.95% | 5.68% |
| APPLE INC. | 5.38% | 9.84% |
| MICROSOFT CORPORATION | 3.89% | 7.18% |
| UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED | 1.05% | 1.20% |
| COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION | 0.66% | 1.48% |
| META PLATFORMS, INC. | 0.63% | 3.46% |
| THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INCORPORATED | 0.52% | 0.65% |
| THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY | 0.48% | 0.63% |
| BLACKROCK, INC. | 0.41% | 0.53% |
| THE PROGRESSIVE CORPORATION | 0.36% | 0.39% |
| UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. | 0.36% | 0.51% |
| VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED | 0.35% | 0.40% |
| Only in IWD | Only in SCHG |
|---|---|
| BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 2.62% | NVIDIA Corp 11.02% |
| JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 2.46% | Alphabet Inc 4.76% |
| INTEL CORPORATION 1.72% | Broadcom Inc 4.55% |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.72% | Tesla Inc 3.92% |
| EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 1.60% | Alphabet Inc 3.78% |
| CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 1.30% | Eli Lilly & Co 3.06% |
| WALMART INC. 1.28% | Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.94% |
| ABBVIE INC. 1.15% | Visa Inc 1.92% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Schwab |
| What it is | Russell 1000 value | U.S. Large-Cap Growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +27.4% | +12.7% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +9.9 pts | −4.8 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.04% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 90.2% | 95.4% |
| Holdings | 870 | 193 |
IWD in plain words
IWD is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +27.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 870 positions, with the top ten at 27.9%.
SCHG in plain words
SCHG is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 193 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWD or SCHG?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWD returned +27.4% and SCHG returned +12.7%, so IWD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IWD or SCHG?
- IWD charges 0.18% a year and SCHG charges 0.04%, so SCHG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IWD and SCHG overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 90% of IWD and 95% of SCHG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 28% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWD against SCHG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWD-SCHG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources