Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IWD vs MAGS: how they differ
IWD and MAGS hold 12% of their weight in the same names, and IWD returned more over the year.
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IWD and MAGS hold 12% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IWD | MAGS |
|---|---|---|
| APPLE INC. | 5.38% | 4.12% |
| AMAZON.COM, INC. | 5.95% | 4.11% |
| MICROSOFT CORPORATION | 3.89% | 3.62% |
| META PLATFORMS, INC. | 0.63% | 3.59% |
| Only in IWD | Only in MAGS |
|---|---|
| BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 2.62% | TREASURY BILL 65.41% |
| JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 2.46% | Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 8.06% |
| INTEL CORPORATION 1.72% | NVIDIA Corp 4.15% |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.72% | Tesla Inc 4.07% |
| EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 1.60% | Alphabet Inc 2.89% |
| CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 1.30% | |
| WALMART INC. 1.28% | |
| ABBVIE INC. 1.15% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
| IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Roundhill |
| What it is | Russell 1000 value | Magnificent Seven |
| Total return, 1 year | +27.4% | +14.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +9.9 pts | −3.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.30% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 90.2% | 26.5% |
| Holdings | 870 | 9 |
IWD in plain words
IWD is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +27.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 870 positions, with the top ten at 27.9%.
MAGS in plain words
MAGS is an index equity fund tracking the Magnificent Seven. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 26% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 9 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWD or MAGS?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWD returned +27.4% and MAGS returned +14.4%, so IWD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IWD or MAGS?
- IWD charges 0.18% a year and MAGS charges 0.30%, so IWD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IWD and MAGS overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 90% of IWD and 26% of MAGS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 12% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWD against MAGS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWD-MAGS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources