Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IWC vs VOOG: how they differ
IWC and VOOG are both equity index funds, and over the year IWC returned more, +31.3% against +17.8%.
iShares Micro-Cap ETF and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund.
| IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF | VOOG Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Vanguard |
| What it is | Russell Microcap | S&P 500 Growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +31.3% | +17.8% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +13.8 pts | +0.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.05% |
| Holdings | not filed | 146 |
IWC in plain words
IWC is an index equity fund tracking the Russell Microcap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +31.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. It sat 5.0% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
VOOG in plain words
VOOG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 146 positions, with the top ten at 60.2%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWC or VOOG?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWC returned +31.3% and VOOG returned +17.8%, so IWC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWC against VOOG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWC-VOOG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources