Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IWC vs VCIT: how they differ
IWC is an equity index fund and VCIT a bond index fund, and over the year IWC returned more, +31.3% against −1.2%.
iShares Micro-Cap ETF and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund.
| IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF | VCIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Vanguard |
| What it is | Russell Microcap | Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond |
| Total return, 1 year | +31.3% | −1.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +13.8 pts | −18.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.03% |
| Holdings | not filed | 2302 |
IWC in plain words
IWC is an index equity fund tracking the Russell Microcap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +31.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. It sat 5.0% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
VCIT in plain words
VCIT is a bond fund tracking the Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −1.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.4% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWC or VCIT?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWC returned +31.3% and VCIT returned −1.2%, so IWC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWC against VCIT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWC-VCIT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources