Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IWC vs TLT: how they differ
IWC is an equity index fund and TLT a bond index fund, and over the year IWC returned more, +31.3% against −6.4%.
iShares Micro-Cap ETF and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF.
| IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF | TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | Russell Microcap | 20+ year Treasuries |
| Total return, 1 year | +31.3% | −6.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +13.8 pts | −23.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.15% |
IWC in plain words
IWC is an index equity fund tracking the Russell Microcap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +31.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. It sat 5.0% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
TLT in plain words
TLT is a bond fund tracking the 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −6.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 42.9% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWC or TLT?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWC returned +31.3% and TLT returned −6.4%, so IWC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWC against TLT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWC-TLT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources