Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IWC vs SHV: how they differ
IWC is an equity index fund and SHV a bond index fund, and over the year IWC returned more, +31.3% against +3.6%.
iShares Micro-Cap ETF and iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF.
| IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF | SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | Russell Microcap | 0-1 Year Treasury Bond |
| Total return, 1 year | +31.3% | +3.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +13.8 pts | −13.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.15% |
| Holdings | not filed | 13 |
IWC in plain words
IWC is an index equity fund tracking the Russell Microcap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +31.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. It sat 5.0% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
SHV in plain words
SHV is a bond fund tracking the 0-1 Year Treasury Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWC or SHV?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWC returned +31.3% and SHV returned +3.6%, so IWC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWC against SHV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWC-SHV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources