Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IVV vs XYLD: how they differ
Over the year IVV and XYLD finished level, +17.6% against +17.9%, and IVV charges 0.03% against 0.60%.
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IVV and XYLD hold 72% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IVV | XYLD |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp. | 7.52% | 7.85% |
| Microsoft Corp. | 4.30% | 4.90% |
| Alphabet, Inc. | 3.25% | 3.63% |
| Broadcom, Inc. | 2.77% | 3.20% |
| Alphabet, Inc. | 2.59% | 2.89% |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. | 1.92% | 2.17% |
| Tesla, Inc. | 1.84% | 1.74% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 1.36% | 1.37% |
| Eli Lilly & Co. | 1.47% | 1.20% |
| Micron Technology, Inc. | 2.02% | 0.94% |
| Johnson & Johnson | 0.95% | 0.90% |
| Visa, Inc. | 0.88% | 0.90% |
| Only in IVV | Only in XYLD |
|---|---|
| Apple, Inc. 6.59% | APPLE INC. 6.45% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. 3.62% | AMAZON.COM, INC. 4.19% |
| Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 1.47% | BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 1.41% |
| Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. 1.42% | ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 0.94% |
| Applied Materials, Inc. 0.89% | BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION 0.57% |
| Bank of America Corp. 0.58% | APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 0.51% |
| Marvell Technology, Inc. 0.41% | RTX CORPORATION 0.38% |
| RTX Corp. 0.40% | LINDE PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 0.38% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Income ETF |
| Issuer | iShares | Global X |
| What it is | S&P 500 | covered call, vs ACWI |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.6% | +17.9% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +19.1% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +0.1 pts | −1.2 pts |
| Cash paid, 1 year | not an income fund | 11.0% |
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.60% |
| Holdings | 504 | not filed |
IVV in plain words
IVV is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 504 positions, with the top ten at 36.4%.
XYLD in plain words
Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, XYLD paid 11.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 5.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.9%. All-country world (ACWI) returned +19.1% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.2 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.0%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 93% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IVV or XYLD?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IVV returned +17.6% and XYLD returned +17.9%, so XYLD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IVV or XYLD?
- IVV charges 0.03% a year and XYLD charges 0.60%, so IVV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- Are IVV and XYLD the same kind of fund?
- No. IVV is an index ETF and XYLD is an option-income ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IVV against XYLD, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IVV-XYLD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources