Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IVV vs XHB: how they differ

IVV and XHB hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and IVV returned more over the year.

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Homebuilders ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IVV and XHB hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IVV and XHB both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIVVXHB
Home Depot, Inc. (The)0.55%3.28%
Lowe's Cos., Inc.0.19%3.03%
Johnson Controls International plc0.14%3.11%
Carrier Global Corp.0.09%3.20%
DR Horton, Inc.0.07%3.29%
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.0.04%3.34%
PulteGroup, Inc.0.04%3.44%
Lennar Corp.0.03%2.99%
NVR, Inc.0.03%3.21%
Lennox International, Inc.0.03%3.37%
Masco Corp.0.03%3.41%
Allegion plc0.02%3.22%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IVVOnly in XHB
NVIDIA Corp. 7.52%Owens Corning 4.10%
Apple, Inc. 6.59%Advanced Drainage Systems Inc 3.60%
Microsoft Corp. 4.30%KB Home 3.56%
Amazon.com, Inc. 3.62%Meritage Homes Corp 3.53%
Alphabet, Inc. 3.25%Toll Brothers Inc 3.52%
Broadcom, Inc. 2.77%Installed Building Products Inc 3.49%
Alphabet, Inc. 2.59%Somnigroup International Inc 3.40%
Micron Technology, Inc. 2.02%Champion Homes Inc 3.34%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

IVV and XHB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
XHB
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Homebuilders ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isS&P 500SPDR S&P Homebuilders
Total return, 1 year+17.6%−16.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.1 pts−34.1 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.35%
Already in the S&P 500100.0%45.7%
Holdings50435

IVV in plain words

IVV is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 504 positions, with the top ten at 36.4%.

XHB in plain words

XHB is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Homebuilders. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −16.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 46% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 35 positions, with the top ten at 35.6%. It sat 20.6% below its high of Oct 18, 2024 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IVV or XHB?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IVV returned +17.6% and XHB returned −16.6%, so IVV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IVV or XHB?
IVV charges 0.03% a year and XHB charges 0.35%, so IVV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IVV and XHB overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of IVV and 46% of XHB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IVV against XHB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IVV against XHB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IVV-XHB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources