Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IVV vs VONG: how they differ

IVV and VONG hold 57% of their weight in the same names, and IVV returned more over the year.

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IVV and VONG hold 57% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IVV and VONG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIVVVONG
NVIDIA Corp.7.52%13.09%
Apple, Inc.6.59%11.97%
Microsoft Corp.4.30%8.98%
Amazon.com, Inc.3.62%5.07%
Alphabet, Inc.3.25%3.91%
Broadcom, Inc.2.77%5.78%
Alphabet, Inc.2.59%3.15%
Meta Platforms, Inc.1.92%3.20%
Tesla, Inc.1.84%3.48%
Eli Lilly & Co.1.47%2.67%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.1.47%1.47%
Visa, Inc.0.88%1.57%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IVVOnly in VONG
Micron Technology, Inc. 2.02%Trane Technologies PLC 0.30%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. 1.42%Snowflake Inc 0.26%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. 1.36%Spotify Technology SA 0.23%
Intel Corp. 1.02%Cloudflare Inc 0.23%
Johnson & Johnson 0.95%Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd 0.22%
Exxon Mobil Corp. 0.88%Rocket Lab Corp 0.21%
Cisco Systems, Inc. 0.72%Aon PLC 0.18%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc. 0.59%Astera Labs Inc 0.13%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

IVV and VONG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isS&P 500Russell 1000 Growth
Total return, 1 year+17.6%+7.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.1 pts−10.3 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.07%
Already in the S&P 500100.0%95.6%
Holdings504387

IVV in plain words

IVV is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 504 positions, with the top ten at 36.4%.

VONG in plain words

VONG is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 387 positions, with the top ten at 61.3%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IVV or VONG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IVV returned +17.6% and VONG returned +7.2%, so IVV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IVV or VONG?
IVV charges 0.03% a year and VONG charges 0.07%, so IVV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IVV and VONG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of IVV and 96% of VONG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 57% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IVV against VONG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IVV against VONG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IVV-VONG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources