Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IVV vs VDC: how they differ

IVV and VDC hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and IVV returned more over the year.

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF and Vanguard Consumer Staples Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IVV and VDC hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IVV and VDC both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIVVVDC
Walmart, Inc.0.77%14.76%
Costco Wholesale Corp.0.64%12.04%
Procter & Gamble Co. (The)0.53%9.27%
Coca-Cola Co. (The)0.49%8.72%
Philip Morris International, Inc.0.44%4.66%
PepsiCo, Inc.0.29%4.30%
Altria Group, Inc.0.19%3.91%
Mondelez International, Inc.0.12%2.69%
Colgate-Palmolive Co.0.11%2.37%
Monster Beverage Corp.0.11%2.24%
Target Corp.0.09%2.03%
Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc.0.07%1.41%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IVVOnly in VDC
NVIDIA Corp. 7.52%US Foods Holding Corp 0.74%
Apple, Inc. 6.59%Bunge Global SA 0.73%
Microsoft Corp. 4.30%Performance Food Group Co 0.66%
Amazon.com, Inc. 3.62%Darling Ingredients Inc 0.52%
Alphabet, Inc. 3.25%BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings Inc 0.50%
Broadcom, Inc. 2.77%Sprouts Farmers Market Inc 0.46%
Alphabet, Inc. 2.59%Coca-Cola Consolidated Inc 0.45%
Micron Technology, Inc. 2.02%Primo Brands Corp 0.41%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

IVV and VDC on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isS&P 500Consumer Staples
Total return, 1 year+17.6%+4.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.1 pts−12.9 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.09%
Already in the S&P 500100.0%86.6%
Holdings504103

IVV in plain words

IVV is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 504 positions, with the top ten at 36.4%.

VDC in plain words

VDC is an index equity fund tracking the Consumer Staples. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 103 positions, with the top ten at 65.0%. It sat 6.8% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IVV or VDC?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IVV returned +17.6% and VDC returned +4.6%, so IVV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IVV or VDC?
IVV charges 0.03% a year and VDC charges 0.09%, so IVV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IVV and VDC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of IVV and 87% of VDC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IVV against VDC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IVV against VDC, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IVV-VDC Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources