Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IVV vs SPYI: how they differ

Over the year IVV returned more, +17.6% against +15.8%, and IVV charges 0.03% against 0.68%.

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF and NEOS S&P 500(R) High Income ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IVV and SPYI hold 97% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IVV and SPYI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIVVSPYI
NVIDIA Corp.7.52%7.57%
Apple, Inc.6.59%6.59%
Microsoft Corp.4.30%4.32%
Amazon.com, Inc.3.62%3.65%
Alphabet, Inc.3.25%3.28%
Broadcom, Inc.2.77%2.80%
Alphabet, Inc.2.59%2.61%
Micron Technology, Inc.2.02%1.99%
Meta Platforms, Inc.1.92%1.92%
Tesla, Inc.1.84%1.85%
Eli Lilly & Co.1.47%1.47%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.1.47%1.47%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IVVOnly in SPYI
Linde plc 0.37%Linde PLC 0.37%
Seagate Technology Holdings plc 0.34%Seagate Technology Holdings PL 0.32%
Eaton Corp. plc 0.26%Eaton Corp PLC 0.26%
Chubb Ltd. 0.19%Chubb Ltd 0.19%
Trane Technologies plc 0.17%Trane Technologies PLC 0.17%
Medtronic plc 0.16%Medtronic PLC 0.16%
Johnson Controls International plc 0.14%Johnson Controls International 0.14%
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. 0.12%Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd 0.12%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

IVV and SPYI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
SPYI
NEOS S&P 500(R) High Income ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundIncome ETF
IssueriSharesNEOS
What it isS&P 500covered call, vs SPY
Total return, 1 year+17.6%+15.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.1 pts−1.7 pts
Cash paid, 1 yearnot an income fund12.1%
Expense ratio0.03%0.68%
Holdings504not filed

IVV in plain words

IVV is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 504 positions, with the top ten at 36.4%.

SPYI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, SPYI paid 12.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +15.8%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +17.5% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.7 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.2%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 93% of the distribution paid Jun 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IVV or SPYI?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IVV returned +17.6% and SPYI returned +15.8%, so IVV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IVV or SPYI?
IVV charges 0.03% a year and SPYI charges 0.68%, so IVV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Are IVV and SPYI the same kind of fund?
No. IVV is an index ETF and SPYI is an option-income ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IVV against SPYI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IVV against SPYI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IVV-SPYI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources