Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IVV vs SPYG: how they differ

IVV and SPYG hold 65% of their weight in the same names.

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IVV and SPYG hold 65% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IVV and SPYG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIVVSPYG
NVIDIA Corp.7.52%13.66%
Apple, Inc.6.59%5.99%
Microsoft Corp.4.30%7.81%
Amazon.com, Inc.3.62%3.48%
Alphabet, Inc.3.25%5.91%
Broadcom, Inc.2.77%5.04%
Alphabet, Inc.2.59%4.71%
Micron Technology, Inc.2.02%3.67%
Meta Platforms, Inc.1.92%3.49%
Tesla, Inc.1.84%2.07%
Eli Lilly & Co.1.47%2.67%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.1.47%2.67%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IVVOnly in SPYG
Intel Corp. 1.02%Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.39%
Exxon Mobil Corp. 0.88%Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd 0.22%
Walmart, Inc. 0.77%Flex Ltd 0.17%
Costco Wholesale Corp. 0.64%Trane Technologies PLC 0.16%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc. 0.59%TE Connectivity PLC 0.11%
Bank of America Corp. 0.58%Carnival Corp Ltd 0.10%
Home Depot, Inc. (The) 0.55%STERIS PLC 0.03%
Procter & Gamble Co. (The) 0.53%Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd 0.01%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

IVV and SPYG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
SPYG
State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isS&P 500SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth
Total return, 1 year+17.6%+17.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.1 pts+0.4 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.04%
Already in the S&P 500100.0%100.0%
Holdings504147

IVV in plain words

IVV is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 504 positions, with the top ten at 36.4%.

SPYG in plain words

SPYG is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 147 positions, with the top ten at 56.4%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IVV or SPYG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IVV returned +17.6% and SPYG returned +17.9%, so SPYG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IVV or SPYG?
IVV charges 0.03% a year and SPYG charges 0.04%, so IVV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IVV and SPYG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of IVV and 100% of SPYG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 65% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IVV against SPYG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IVV against SPYG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IVV-SPYG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources