Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IVV vs SCHX: how they differ
IVV and SCHX hold 90% of their weight in the same names, and IVV returned more over the year.
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IVV and SCHX hold 90% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IVV | SCHX |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp. | 7.52% | 7.51% |
| Apple, Inc. | 6.59% | 6.71% |
| Microsoft Corp. | 4.30% | 4.89% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. | 3.62% | 3.87% |
| Alphabet, Inc. | 3.25% | 3.24% |
| Broadcom, Inc. | 2.77% | 3.10% |
| Alphabet, Inc. | 2.59% | 2.58% |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. | 1.92% | 2.02% |
| Tesla, Inc. | 1.84% | 1.79% |
| Micron Technology, Inc. | 2.02% | 1.60% |
| Eli Lilly & Co. | 1.47% | 1.28% |
| Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. | 1.42% | 1.27% |
| Only in IVV | Only in SCHX |
|---|---|
| Sandisk Corp. 0.52% | Linde PLC 0.34% |
| Linde plc 0.37% | Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.28% |
| Seagate Technology Holdings plc 0.34% | Eaton Corp PLC 0.23% |
| Eaton Corp. plc 0.26% | Honeywell International Inc 0.22% |
| Chubb Ltd. 0.19% | Accenture PLC 0.17% |
| Trane Technologies plc 0.17% | Chubb Ltd 0.17% |
| Medtronic plc 0.16% | Trane Technologies PLC 0.15% |
| Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. 0.12% | Medtronic PLC 0.14% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Schwab |
| What it is | S&P 500 | U.S. Large-Cap |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.6% | +16.8% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +0.1 pts | −0.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 100.0% | 94.9% |
| Holdings | 504 | 748 |
IVV in plain words
IVV is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 504 positions, with the top ten at 36.4%.
SCHX in plain words
SCHX is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 748 positions, with the top ten at 37.3%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IVV or SCHX?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IVV returned +17.6% and SCHX returned +16.8%, so IVV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IVV or SCHX?
- IVV charges 0.03% a year and SCHX charges 0.03%, so IVV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IVV and SCHX overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 100% of IVV and 95% of SCHX by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 90% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IVV against SCHX, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IVV-SCHX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources