Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IVV vs SCHG: how they differ
IVV and SCHG hold 52% of their weight in the same names, and IVV returned more over the year.
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IVV and SCHG hold 52% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IVV | SCHG |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp. | 7.52% | 11.02% |
| Apple, Inc. | 6.59% | 9.84% |
| Microsoft Corp. | 4.30% | 7.18% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. | 3.62% | 5.68% |
| Alphabet, Inc. | 3.25% | 4.76% |
| Broadcom, Inc. | 2.77% | 4.55% |
| Alphabet, Inc. | 2.59% | 3.78% |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. | 1.92% | 3.46% |
| Tesla, Inc. | 1.84% | 3.92% |
| Eli Lilly & Co. | 1.47% | 3.06% |
| Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 1.47% | 2.94% |
| Visa, Inc. | 0.88% | 1.92% |
| Only in IVV | Only in SCHG |
|---|---|
| Micron Technology, Inc. 2.02% | Linde PLC 0.81% |
| Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. 1.42% | Trane Technologies PLC 0.35% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. 1.36% | Snowflake Inc 0.31% |
| Intel Corp. 1.02% | Cloudflare Inc 0.27% |
| Johnson & Johnson 0.95% | Rocket Lab Corp 0.24% |
| Applied Materials, Inc. 0.89% | TE Connectivity PLC 0.22% |
| Exxon Mobil Corp. 0.88% | Strategy Inc 0.17% |
| Lam Research Corp. 0.84% | Astera Labs Inc 0.16% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Schwab |
| What it is | S&P 500 | U.S. Large-Cap Growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.6% | +12.7% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +0.1 pts | −4.8 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.04% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 100.0% | 95.4% |
| Holdings | 504 | 193 |
IVV in plain words
IVV is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 504 positions, with the top ten at 36.4%.
SCHG in plain words
SCHG is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 193 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IVV or SCHG?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IVV returned +17.6% and SCHG returned +12.7%, so IVV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IVV or SCHG?
- IVV charges 0.03% a year and SCHG charges 0.04%, so IVV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IVV and SCHG overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 100% of IVV and 95% of SCHG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 52% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IVV against SCHG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IVV-SCHG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources