Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IVV vs RDVY: how they differ

IVV and RDVY hold 23% of their weight in the same names, and RDVY returned more over the year.

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IVV and RDVY hold 23% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IVV and RDVY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIVVRDVY
Alphabet, Inc.3.25%2.12%
NVIDIA Corp.7.52%1.91%
Micron Technology, Inc.2.02%1.83%
Meta Platforms, Inc.1.92%1.50%
Microsoft Corp.4.30%1.45%
Apple, Inc.6.59%1.44%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.1.36%1.91%
Applied Materials, Inc.0.89%4.69%
Visa, Inc.0.88%1.82%
Lam Research Corp.0.84%4.42%
Costco Wholesale Corp.0.64%1.73%
Mastercard, Inc.0.64%1.19%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IVVOnly in RDVY
Amazon.com, Inc. 3.62%CHUBB LTD (SWITZERLAND) 1.97%
Broadcom, Inc. 2.77%MUELLER INDUSTRIES INC 1.93%
Alphabet, Inc. 2.59%COCA-COLA CONSOLIDATED INC 1.16%
Tesla, Inc. 1.84%EAST WEST BANCORP INC 1.01%
Eli Lilly & Co. 1.47%ACCENTURE PLC 1.00%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 1.47%EVEREST GROUP LTD 0.54%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. 1.42%UNUM GROUP 0.51%
Intel Corp. 1.02%ALLISON TRANSMISSION HOLDINGS INC 0.40%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

IVV and RDVY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesFirst Trust
What it isS&P 500First Rising Dividend Achievers
Total return, 1 year+17.6%+22.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.1 pts+4.5 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.47%
Already in the S&P 500100.0%94.4%
Holdings50471

IVV in plain words

IVV is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 504 positions, with the top ten at 36.4%.

RDVY in plain words

RDVY is an index equity fund tracking the First Rising Dividend Achievers. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 71 positions, with the top ten at 28.6%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IVV or RDVY?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IVV returned +17.6% and RDVY returned +22.0%, so RDVY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IVV or RDVY?
IVV charges 0.03% a year and RDVY charges 0.47%, so IVV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IVV and RDVY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of IVV and 94% of RDVY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 23% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IVV against RDVY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IVV against RDVY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IVV-RDVY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources