Which returned more over the last year, IVV or QDTE?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IVV returned +17.6% and QDTE returned +22.3%, so QDTE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, IVV or QDTE?

IVV charges 0.03% a year and QDTE charges 0.96%, so IVV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Are IVV and QDTE the same kind of fund?

No. IVV is an index ETF and QDTE is an option-income ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IVV vs QDTE: how they differ

Over the year QDTE returned more, +22.3% against +17.6%, and IVV charges 0.03% against 0.96%.

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IVV and QDTE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IVV	Only in QDTE
NVIDIA Corp. 7.52%	Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF 100.00%
Apple, Inc. 6.59%
Microsoft Corp. 4.30%
Amazon.com, Inc. 3.62%
Alphabet, Inc. 3.25%
Broadcom, Inc. 2.77%
Alphabet, Inc. 2.59%
Micron Technology, Inc. 2.02%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

IVV and QDTE on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF	QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Income ETF
Issuer	iShares	Roundhill
What it is	S&P 500	0DTE covered call, vs QQQ
Total return, 1 year	+17.6%	+22.3%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+23.0%
Gap to the S&P 500	+0.1 pts	−0.7 pts
Cash paid, 1 year	not an income fund	36.8%
Expense ratio	0.03%	0.96%
Holdings	504	not filed

IVV in plain words

IVV is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 504 positions, with the top ten at 36.4%.

QDTE in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, QDTE paid 36.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 18.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +22.3%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +23.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.7 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 24.3%, paid weekly.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IVV or QDTE?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IVV returned +17.6% and QDTE returned +22.3%, so QDTE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IVV or QDTE?: IVV charges 0.03% a year and QDTE charges 0.96%, so IVV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Are IVV and QDTE the same kind of fund?: No. IVV is an index ETF and QDTE is an option-income ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IVV against QDTE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IVV against QDTE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IVV-QDTE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources