Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IVV vs MOAT: how they differ

IVV and MOAT hold 15% of their weight in the same names, and IVV returned more over the year.

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IVV and MOAT hold 15% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IVV and MOAT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIVVMOAT
NVIDIA Corp.7.52%2.45%
Broadcom, Inc.2.77%2.43%
Microsoft Corp.4.30%2.20%
Amazon.com, Inc.3.62%1.33%
Meta Platforms, Inc.1.92%1.17%
Applied Materials, Inc.0.89%2.34%
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.0.43%2.51%
Amphenol Corp.0.34%1.50%
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.0.29%1.18%
PepsiCo, Inc.0.29%1.17%
Walt Disney Co. (The)0.26%1.19%
Charles Schwab Corp. (The)0.23%2.45%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IVVOnly in MOAT
Apple, Inc. 6.59%LPL Financial Holdings Inc 2.30%
Alphabet, Inc. 3.25%Entegris Inc 1.73%
Alphabet, Inc. 2.59%MercadoLibre Inc 1.28%
Micron Technology, Inc. 2.02%Guidewire Software Inc 1.18%
Tesla, Inc. 1.84%TransUnion 1.16%
Eli Lilly & Co. 1.47%MarketAxess Holdings Inc 0.73%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 1.47%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. 1.42%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

IVV and MOAT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanEck
What it isS&P 500Morningstar Wide Moat
Total return, 1 year+17.6%+11.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.1 pts−6.2 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.46%
Already in the S&P 500100.0%91.6%
Holdings50455

IVV in plain words

IVV is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 504 positions, with the top ten at 36.4%.

MOAT in plain words

MOAT is an index equity fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.46% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 55 positions, with the top ten at 25.3%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IVV or MOAT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IVV returned +17.6% and MOAT returned +11.3%, so IVV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IVV or MOAT?
IVV charges 0.03% a year and MOAT charges 0.46%, so IVV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IVV and MOAT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of IVV and 92% of MOAT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 15% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IVV against MOAT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IVV against MOAT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IVV-MOAT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources