Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IVV vs IYR: how they differ

IVV and IYR hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and IVV returned more over the year.

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF and iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IVV and IYR hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IVV and IYR both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIVVIYR
Welltower, Inc.0.25%10.88%
Prologis, Inc.0.20%8.77%
Equinix, Inc.0.16%4.58%
American Tower Corp.0.12%3.88%
Simon Property Group, Inc.0.11%4.79%
Digital Realty Trust, Inc.0.09%4.41%
Realty Income Corp.0.09%4.29%
Public Storage0.08%3.74%
Ventas, Inc.0.07%3.21%
CBRE Group, Inc.0.06%2.93%
Iron Mountain, Inc.0.06%2.79%
Crown Castle, Inc.0.05%2.46%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IVVOnly in IYR
NVIDIA Corp. 7.52%ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. 1.22%
Apple, Inc. 6.59%W.P. CAREY INC. 1.18%
Microsoft Corp. 4.30%JONES LANG LASALLE INCORPORATED 1.07%
Amazon.com, Inc. 3.62%OMEGA HEALTHCARE INVESTORS, INC. 1.05%
Alphabet, Inc. 3.25%SUN COMMUNITIES, INC. 1.03%
Broadcom, Inc. 2.77%LAMAR ADVERTISING COMPANY 1.01%
Alphabet, Inc. 2.59%Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. 0.94%
Micron Technology, Inc. 2.02%AGNC INVESTMENT CORP. 0.93%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

IVV and IYR on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
IYR
iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isS&P 500U.S. Real Estate
Total return, 1 year+17.6%+4.7%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.1 pts−12.8 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.37%
Already in the S&P 500100.0%80.4%
Holdings50461

IVV in plain words

IVV is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 504 positions, with the top ten at 36.4%.

IYR in plain words

IYR is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Real Estate. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 80% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 61 positions, with the top ten at 51.5%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Jul 28, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IVV or IYR?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IVV returned +17.6% and IYR returned +4.7%, so IVV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IVV or IYR?
IVV charges 0.03% a year and IYR charges 0.37%, so IVV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IVV and IYR overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of IVV and 80% of IYR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IVV against IYR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IVV against IYR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IVV-IYR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources