Which returned more over the last year, IUSB or XOVR?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IUSB returned −0.3% and XOVR returned 0.0%, so XOVR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, IUSB or XOVR?

IUSB charges 0.06% a year and XOVR charges 0.75%, so IUSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IUSB vs XOVR: how they differ

IUSB and XOVR hold 0% of their weight in the same names.

iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF and ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IUSB and XOVR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IUSB	Only in XOVR
United States of America 0.38%	Nvidia Corp 9.48%
United States of America 0.37%	Astera Labs Inc 7.75%
United States of America 0.37%	Alphabet Inc 6.53%
United States of America 0.37%	Meta Platforms Inc 4.47%
United States of America 0.36%	Applovin Corp 3.95%
United States of America 0.36%	Natera Inc 3.70%
United States of America 0.36%	Robinhood Markets Inc 3.56%
United States of America 0.35%	Veeva Systems Inc 3.17%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

IUSB and XOVR on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	IUSB iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF	XOVR ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	ERShares
What it is	Core Universal USD Bond	Private-Public Crossover
Total return, 1 year	−0.3%	0.0%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−17.8 pts	−17.5 pts
Expense ratio	0.06%	0.75%
Holdings	17819	32

IUSB in plain words

IUSB is a bond fund tracking the Core Universal USD Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year.

XOVR in plain words

XOVR is an index equity fund tracking the Private-Public Crossover. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned 0.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 43% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 32 positions, with the top ten at 63.1%. It sat 4.2% below its high of Oct 27, 2025 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IUSB or XOVR?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IUSB returned −0.3% and XOVR returned 0.0%, so XOVR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IUSB or XOVR?: IUSB charges 0.06% a year and XOVR charges 0.75%, so IUSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IUSB against XOVR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IUSB against XOVR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IUSB-XOVR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources