Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IUSB vs USO: how they differ

IUSB is a bond index fund and USO a commodity fund, and over the year USO returned more, +112.2% against −0.3%.

iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF and United States Oil Fund, LP.

IUSB and USO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IUSB
iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF
USO
United States Oil Fund, LP
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesUnited
What it isCore Universal USD BondOil
Total return, 1 year−0.3%+112.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−17.8 pts+94.7 pts
Expense ratio0.06%not published
Holdings17819not filed

IUSB in plain words

IUSB is a bond fund tracking the Core Universal USD Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year.

USO in plain words

USO is a commodity fund tracking the Oil. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +112.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. It sat 57.1% below its high of Apr 8, 2011 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IUSB or USO?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IUSB returned −0.3% and USO returned +112.2%, so USO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IUSB against USO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IUSB against USO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IUSB-USO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources