Which returned more over the last year, IUSB or SCHF?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IUSB returned −0.3% and SCHF returned +25.4%, so SCHF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, IUSB or SCHF?

IUSB charges 0.06% a year and SCHF charges 0.03%, so SCHF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IUSB vs SCHF: how they differ

IUSB and SCHF hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and SCHF returned more over the year.

iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF and Schwab International Equity ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IUSB and SCHF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IUSB and SCHF both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding	IUSB	SCHF
Bank Hapoalim BM	0.00%	0.12%
Deutsche Bank AG	0.00%	0.19%
Prosus NV	0.00%	0.18%
Yara International ASA	0.00%	0.03%

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IUSB	Only in SCHF
United States of America 0.38%	SK hynix Inc 2.83%
United States of America 0.37%	ASML Holding NV 2.12%
United States of America 0.37%	HSBC Holdings PLC 1.09%
United States of America 0.37%	Novartis AG 0.98%
United States of America 0.36%	AstraZeneca PLC 0.94%
United States of America 0.36%	Royal Bank of Canada 0.91%
United States of America 0.36%	Nestle SA 0.88%
United States of America 0.35%	Shell PLC 0.81%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

IUSB and SCHF on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	IUSB iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF	SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Schwab
What it is	Core Universal USD Bond	International Equity
Total return, 1 year	−0.3%	+25.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−17.8 pts	+8.0 pts
Expense ratio	0.06%	0.03%
Holdings	17819	1476

IUSB in plain words

IUSB is a bond fund tracking the Core Universal USD Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year.

SCHF in plain words

SCHF is an index equity fund tracking the International Equity. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +25.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1476 positions, with the top ten at 14.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IUSB or SCHF?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IUSB returned −0.3% and SCHF returned +25.4%, so SCHF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IUSB or SCHF?: IUSB charges 0.06% a year and SCHF charges 0.03%, so SCHF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IUSB against SCHF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IUSB against SCHF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IUSB-SCHF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources