Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IJT vs VT: how they differ

IJT and VT hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and VT returned more over the year.

iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF and Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IJT and VT hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IJT and VT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIJTVT
FormFactor, Inc.1.38%0.01%
Element Solutions, Inc.0.61%0.01%
Primoris Services Corp.0.60%0.01%
ESCO Technologies, Inc.1.00%0.01%
Everus Construction Group, Inc.0.94%0.01%
Glaukos Corp.0.63%0.01%
Lumen Technologies, Inc.0.36%0.01%
Phillips Edison & Co., Inc.0.34%0.01%
Qorvo, Inc.0.52%0.01%
StoneX Group, Inc.0.93%0.01%
Viasat, Inc.1.35%0.01%
American States Water Co.0.23%0.01%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IJTOnly in VT
Argan, Inc. 1.24%NVIDIA Corp 4.22%
Alkermes plc 0.97%Apple Inc 3.53%
Powell Industries, Inc. 0.90%Microsoft Corp 2.73%
MYR Group, Inc. 0.86%Amazon.com Inc 2.29%
Kodiak Gas Services, Inc. 0.81%Alphabet Inc 2.04%
ACM Research, Inc. 0.80%Broadcom Inc 1.74%
VSE Corp. 0.71%Alphabet Inc 1.61%
Enova International, Inc. 0.66%Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 1.52%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

IJT and VT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IJT
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isS&P Small-Cap 600 GrowthTotal World Stock
Total return, 1 year+17.6%+18.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.1 pts+1.4 pts
Expense ratio0.18%0.06%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%55.2%
Holdings34710042

IJT in plain words

IJT is an index equity fund tracking the S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 347 positions, with the top ten at 11.0%. It sat 7.0% below its high of Aug 4, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VT in plain words

VT is an index equity fund tracking the Total World Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10042 positions, with the top ten at 21.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IJT or VT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJT returned +17.6% and VT returned +18.9%, so VT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IJT or VT?
IJT charges 0.18% a year and VT charges 0.06%, so VT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IJT and VT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJT and 55% of VT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IJT against VT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJT against VT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IJT-VT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources