Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IJT vs VOX: how they differ
IJT and VOX hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and IJT returned more over the year.
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF and Vanguard Communication Services Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IJT and VOX hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IJT | VOX |
|---|---|---|
| Lumen Technologies, Inc. | 0.36% | 0.65% |
| Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. | 0.80% | 0.35% |
| Iridium Communications, Inc. | 0.39% | 0.29% |
| Sphere Entertainment Co. | 0.52% | 0.21% |
| Cinemark Holdings, Inc. | 0.22% | 0.18% |
| Cargurus, Inc. | 0.14% | 0.15% |
| Uniti Group, Inc. | 0.23% | 0.10% |
| DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. | 0.09% | 0.08% |
| Yelp, Inc. | 0.08% | 0.08% |
| TripAdvisor, Inc. | 0.18% | 0.07% |
| ZoomInfo Technologies, Inc. | 0.05% | 0.05% |
| QuinStreet, Inc. | 0.06% | 0.04% |
| Only in IJT | Only in VOX |
|---|---|
| FormFactor, Inc. 1.38% | Meta Platforms Inc 21.12% |
| Viasat, Inc. 1.35% | Alphabet Inc 16.14% |
| Argan, Inc. 1.24% | Alphabet Inc 10.61% |
| BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. 1.22% | Netflix Inc 4.77% |
| Krystal Biotech, Inc. 1.08% | Verizon Communications Inc 4.17% |
| ESCO Technologies, Inc. 1.00% | Walt Disney Co/The 3.96% |
| Alkermes plc 0.97% | AT&T Inc 3.69% |
| Everus Construction Group, Inc. 0.94% | Warner Bros Discovery Inc 2.74% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| IJT iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF | VOX Vanguard Communication Services Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Vanguard |
| What it is | S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth | Communication Services |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.6% | +2.9% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +0.1 pts | −14.6 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.09% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 84.5% |
| Holdings | 347 | 114 |
IJT in plain words
IJT is an index equity fund tracking the S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 347 positions, with the top ten at 11.0%. It sat 7.0% below its high of Aug 4, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
VOX in plain words
VOX is an index equity fund tracking the Communication Services. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 114 positions, with the top ten at 72.1%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IJT or VOX?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJT returned +17.6% and VOX returned +2.9%, so IJT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IJT or VOX?
- IJT charges 0.18% a year and VOX charges 0.09%, so VOX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IJT and VOX overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJT and 84% of VOX by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJT against VOX, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IJT-VOX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources