Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IJT vs VBR: how they differ

IJT and VBR hold 10% of their weight in the same names, and IJT returned more over the year.

iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF and Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IJT and VBR hold 10% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IJT and VBR both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIJTVBR
Viasat, Inc.1.35%0.25%
Element Solutions, Inc.0.61%0.24%
Ralliant Corp.0.47%0.18%
Plexus Corp.0.39%0.17%
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp.0.83%0.17%
Enpro, Inc.0.88%0.17%
Qorvo, Inc.0.52%0.16%
Arcosa, Inc.0.51%0.15%
Macerich Co. (The)0.41%0.15%
Terreno Realty Corp.0.53%0.15%
Archrock, Inc.0.79%0.15%
Materion Corp.0.38%0.13%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IJTOnly in VBR
FormFactor, Inc. 1.38%Jabil Inc 0.87%
Argan, Inc. 1.24%NRG Energy Inc 0.66%
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. 1.22%Tapestry Inc 0.64%
Krystal Biotech, Inc. 1.08%Atmos Energy Corp 0.62%
ESCO Technologies, Inc. 1.00%Williams-Sonoma Inc 0.59%
Alkermes plc 0.97%Moderna Inc 0.54%
Everus Construction Group, Inc. 0.94%Smurfit Westrock PLC 0.52%
StoneX Group, Inc. 0.93%F5 Inc 0.50%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

IJT and VBR on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IJT
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isS&P Small-Cap 600 GrowthSmall-Cap Value
Total return, 1 year+17.6%+16.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.1 pts−1.2 pts
Expense ratio0.18%0.05%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%30.5%
Holdings347840

IJT in plain words

IJT is an index equity fund tracking the S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 347 positions, with the top ten at 11.0%. It sat 7.0% below its high of Aug 4, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VBR in plain words

VBR is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 30% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 840 positions, with the top ten at 5.9%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IJT or VBR?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJT returned +17.6% and VBR returned +16.3%, so IJT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IJT or VBR?
IJT charges 0.18% a year and VBR charges 0.05%, so VBR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IJT and VBR overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJT and 30% of VBR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 10% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IJT against VBR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJT against VBR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IJT-VBR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources