Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IJT vs IWF: how they differ

IJT and IWF hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IJT returned more over the year.

iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IJT and IWF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IJT and IWF both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIJTIWF
FormFactor, Inc.1.38%0.04%
Powell Industries, Inc.0.90%0.03%
Corcept Therapeutics, Inc.0.92%0.02%
Everus Construction Group, Inc.0.94%0.02%
Etsy, Inc.0.79%0.01%
Madison Square Garden Sports Corp.0.80%0.01%
Armstrong World Industries, Inc.0.76%0.01%
Iridium Communications, Inc.0.39%0.01%
Lazard, Inc.0.04%0.00%
Lyft, Inc.0.61%0.00%
Credit Acceptance Corp.0.19%0.00%
Primoris Services Corp.0.60%0.00%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IJTOnly in IWF
Viasat, Inc. 1.35%NVIDIA CORPORATION 13.85%
Argan, Inc. 1.24%APPLE INC. 6.72%
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. 1.22%ALPHABET INC. 6.18%
Krystal Biotech, Inc. 1.08%BROADCOM INC. 5.21%
ESCO Technologies, Inc. 1.00%ALPHABET INC. 4.98%
Alkermes plc 0.97%MICROSOFT CORPORATION 4.11%
StoneX Group, Inc. 0.93%MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 3.86%
Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. 0.90%TESLA, INC. 3.65%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

IJT and IWF on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IJT
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
IWF
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isS&P Small-Cap 600 GrowthRussell 1000 growth
Total return, 1 year+17.6%+7.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.1 pts−10.5 pts
Expense ratio0.18%0.18%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%93.6%
Holdings347368

IJT in plain words

IJT is an index equity fund tracking the S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 347 positions, with the top ten at 11.0%. It sat 7.0% below its high of Aug 4, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

IWF in plain words

IWF is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 368 positions, with the top ten at 54.4%. It sat 5.0% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IJT or IWF?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJT returned +17.6% and IWF returned +7.0%, so IJT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IJT or IWF?
IJT charges 0.18% a year and IWF charges 0.18%, so IJT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IJT and IWF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJT and 94% of IWF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IJT against IWF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJT against IWF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IJT-IWF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources