Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IJS vs VTWO: how they differ
IJS and VTWO hold 27% of their weight in the same names, and IJS returned more over the year.
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF and Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IJS and VTWO hold 27% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IJS | VTWO |
|---|---|---|
| LUMEN TECHNOLOGIES INC | 0.44% | 0.31% |
| SM ENERGY COMPANY | 0.65% | 0.23% |
| MAXLINEAR INC | 0.67% | 0.22% |
| PLEXUS CORP | 0.49% | 0.21% |
| JACKSON FINANCIAL INC | 0.61% | 0.20% |
| TERRENO REALTY CORP | 0.23% | 0.20% |
| VISHAY INTERTECHNOLOGY INC | 0.73% | 0.18% |
| MACERICH COMPANY (THE) | 0.37% | 0.18% |
| ARCOSA INC | 0.28% | 0.18% |
| ESSENTIAL PROPERTIES REALTY TRUST INC | 0.23% | 0.18% |
| GLAUKOS CORP | 0.28% | 0.17% |
| MATSON INC | 0.64% | 0.16% |
| Only in IJS | Only in VTWO |
|---|---|
| MOLINA HEALTHCARE INC 1.30% | Bloom Energy Corp 1.83% |
| MATCH GROUP INC 0.97% | Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 1.12% |
| EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY 0.84% | Sterling Infrastructure Inc 0.76% |
| CARMAX INC 0.82% | Fabrinet 0.69% |
| POOL CORP 0.75% | Nextpower Inc 0.67% |
| LKQ CORP 0.73% | IonQ Inc 0.63% |
| ENPHASE ENERGY INC 0.71% | Coeur Mining Inc 0.58% |
| CONAGRA BRANDS INC 0.69% | TTM Technologies Inc 0.52% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| IJS iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF | VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Vanguard |
| What it is | S&P Small-Cap 600 Value | Russell 2000 |
| Total return, 1 year | +22.1% | +21.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +4.7 pts | +3.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.07% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 0.5% |
| Holdings | 461 | 1951 |
IJS in plain words
IJS is an index equity fund tracking the S&P Small-Cap 600 Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 461 positions, with the top ten at 8.3%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
VTWO in plain words
VTWO is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 2000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1951 positions, with the top ten at 7.8%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IJS or VTWO?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJS returned +22.1% and VTWO returned +21.4%, so IJS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IJS or VTWO?
- IJS charges 0.18% a year and VTWO charges 0.07%, so VTWO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IJS and VTWO overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJS and 0% of VTWO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 27% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJS against VTWO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IJS-VTWO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources